potential COVID-19 treatments - versus placebo - for COVID 19 hospitalized pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.80 [0.70, 0.91]< 148%33 studies (33/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderatecrucial-
death or transfer to ICU 0.73 [0.51, 1.05]< 10%4 studies (4/-)95.6 %lownot evaluable highcrucial-
deaths 0.80 [0.72, 0.89]< 137%70 studies (70/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderatecrucial-
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.74 [0.62, 0.87]< 127%17 studies (17/-)100.0 %some concernlow moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.71 [0.55, 0.91]< 160%15 studies (15/-)99.6 %lowlow highimportant-
clinical improvement 1.12 [1.06, 1.19]> 18%25 studies (25/-)100.0 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.20 [1.07, 1.34]> 10%7 studies (7/-)99.9 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
clinical improvement (28-day) 1.30 [1.10, 1.52]> 11%10 studies (10/-)99.9 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 0.94 [0.84, 1.06]> 10%6 studies (6/-)16.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.11 [1.05, 1.18]> 10%18 studies (18/-)100.0 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
death or ventilation 0.74 [0.64, 0.84]< 10%15 studies (15/-)100.0 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
hospital discharge 1.03 [0.98, 1.08]> 10%19 studies (19/-)89.9 %lowlow highimportant-
hospitalization 0.67 [0.20, 2.17]< 163%4 studies (4/-)74.9 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
mechanical ventilation 0.86 [0.68, 1.09]< 113%16 studies (16/-)89.2 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation (time to event analysis only) 0.77 [0.31, 1.90]< 10%2 studies (2/-)71.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
Recovery (time to event analysis only) 1.02 [0.81, 1.28]> 10%1 study (1/-)56.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
viral clearance 1.07 [0.78, 1.48]> 165%6 studies (6/-)66.3 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
viral clearance (time to event analysis only) 1.20 [0.69, 2.08]> 175%4 studies (4/-)74.3 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 14 4.10 [1.12, 14.99]> 10%1 study (1/-)98.3 %NAnot evaluable important-
viral clearance by day 7 0.92 [0.78, 1.08]> 10%3 studies (3/-)15.4 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
ICU admission 0.68 [0.50, 0.93]< 10%10 studies (10/-)99.3 %some concernlow moderatenon important-
off oxygenation 0.88 [0.43, 1.80]> 111%2 studies (2/-)36.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
recovery 1.10 [0.97, 1.26]> 142%9 studies (9/-)92.7 %lowserious highnon important-

safety endpoints 00

AE leading to drug discontinuation 2.43 [0.79, 7.45]< 10%1 study (1/-)6.0 %NAnot evaluable important-
composite safety outcome 1.56 [0.78, 3.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)10.3 %NAnot evaluable important-
related AE (TRAE) 1.26 [0.14, 11.07]< 10%2 studies (2/-)41.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
serious adverse events 0.89 [0.77, 1.04]< 111%19 studies (19/-)93.1 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
superinfection 0.74 [0.49, 1.11]< 157%3 studies (3/-)92.9 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
adverse events 1.31 [0.94, 1.81]< 165%18 studies (18/-)5.5 %some concernlow moderatenon important-
deep vein thrombosis 0.62 [0.23, 1.64]< 10%2 studies (2/-)83.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
elevated liver enzymes 0.58 [0.34, 0.97]< 16%2 studies (2/-)98.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
hyperbilirubinemia 0.97 [0.48, 1.93]< 10%2 studies (2/-)53.8 %lownot evaluable highnon important-
pulmonary embolism 0.82 [0.20, 3.29]< 10%2 studies (2/-)61.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
renal impairment 1.02 [0.64, 1.61]< 10%2 studies (2/-)47.2 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
severe adverse events 1.21 [0.02, 64.67]< 10%1 study (1/-)46.4 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.