potential COVID-19 treatments - versus potential COVID-19 treatments - for COVID 19 hospitalized pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.91 [0.87, 0.96]< 131%109 studies (109/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderatecrucial-
death or transfer to ICU 0.90 [0.75, 1.08]< 123%10 studies (10/-)87.0 %some concerncritical moderatecrucial-
deaths 0.90 [0.87, 0.94]< 119%240 studies (240/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderatecrucial1
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.86 [0.78, 0.94]< 153%43 studies (43/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.79 [0.68, 0.91]< 140%48 studies (48/-)100.0 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
clinical improvement 1.18 [1.10, 1.27]> 150%65 studies (65/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.21 [1.08, 1.37]> 146%33 studies (33/-)99.9 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (21-day) 1.59 [0.28, 8.93]> 10%2 studies (2/-)70.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (28-day) 1.30 [1.13, 1.50]> 144%23 studies (23/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 1.19 [1.03, 1.39]> 145%22 studies (22/-)99.1 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.15 [1.07, 1.23]> 139%40 studies (40/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
death or ventilation 0.92 [0.88, 0.97]< 151%42 studies (42/-)99.9 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
hospital discharge 1.04 [1.00, 1.08]> 148%39 studies (39/-)97.7 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
hospitalization 0.67 [0.20, 2.17]< 163%4 studies (4/-)74.9 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
mechanical ventilation 0.88 [0.81, 0.96]< 125%71 studies (71/-)99.8 %some concerncritical moderateimportant1
mechanical ventilation (time to event analysis only) 0.79 [0.47, 1.33]< 122%5 studies (5/-)81.2 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
radiologic improvement (14-day) 1.74 [1.09, 2.79]> 148%9 studies (9/-)99.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
radiologic improvement (7-day) 1.26 [0.22, 7.13]> 163%5 studies (5/-)60.4 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
Recovery (time to event analysis only) 1.02 [0.81, 1.28]> 10%1 study (1/-)56.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
viral clearance 1.71 [1.33, 2.19]> 173%30 studies (30/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
viral clearance (time to event analysis only) 1.38 [1.05, 1.81]> 170%12 studies (12/-)99.0 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 14 1.13 [0.75, 1.70]> 190%19 studies (19/-)71.9 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 7 1.31 [1.08, 1.59]> 159%23 studies (23/-)99.7 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
ICU admission 0.85 [0.73, 0.98]< 111%38 studies (38/-)98.5 %some concernlow moderatenon important-
Major thrombotic events or death 0.80 [0.44, 1.46]< 173%2 studies (2/-)76.3 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
off oxygenation 1.39 [0.29, 6.74]> 170%3 studies (3/-)65.7 %highnot evaluable lownon important-
recovery 1.09 [0.98, 1.21]> 140%15 studies (15/-)95.1 %some concerncritical moderatenon important-
severe COVID-19 occurrence 0.30 [0.07, 1.27]< 10%1 study (1/-)94.9 %NAnot evaluable non important-

safety endpoints 00

AE leading to drug discontinuation 2.43 [0.79, 7.45]< 10%1 study (1/-)6.0 %NAnot evaluable important-
cardiac arrest 1.92 [0.35, 10.49]< 10%1 study (1/-)22.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
composite safety outcome 1.56 [0.78, 3.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)10.3 %NAnot evaluable important-
related AE (TRAE) 1.26 [0.14, 11.07]< 10%2 studies (2/-)41.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
related SAE (TRSAE) 1.29 [0.53, 3.11]< 10%2 studies (2/-)28.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
serious adverse events 0.99 [0.89, 1.12]< 113%54 studies (54/-)53.7 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
superinfection 0.80 [0.50, 1.27]< 161%5 studies (5/-)82.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
acute kidney injury 1.18 [0.44, 3.18]< 10%1 study (1/-)37.2 %NAnot evaluable non important-
adverse events 1.50 [1.28, 1.76]< 149%50 studies (50/-)0.0 %some concerncritical moderatenon important-
arrhythmia 0.91 [0.72, 1.15]< 10%3 studies (3/-)78.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
deep vein thrombosis 0.62 [0.23, 1.64]< 10%2 studies (2/-)83.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
elevated liver enzymes 0.95 [0.29, 3.10]< 184%3 studies (3/-)53.6 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
hyperbilirubinemia 0.97 [0.48, 1.93]< 10%2 studies (2/-)53.8 %lownot evaluable highnon important-
long QT 2.39 [0.24, 23.87]< 180%2 studies (2/-)23.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
Major bleeding 1.80 [1.18, 2.75]< 10%5 studies (5/-)0.3 %some concernserious moderatenon important-
pulmonary embolism 0.82 [0.20, 3.29]< 10%2 studies (2/-)61.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
renal impairment 1.26 [0.95, 1.67]< 10%4 studies (4/-)5.6 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
serious adverse events (SAE), any 0.50 [0.32, 0.79]< 10%1 study (1/-)99.9 %NAnot evaluable non important-
severe adverse events 1.10 [0.07, 18.09]< 10%2 studies (2/-)47.4 %highnot evaluable lownon important-

AE of interest endpoints 00

Thromboembolic events 0.96 [0.73, 1.27]< 10%3 studies (3/-)60.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.