Immunostimulants drugs - versus placebo - for COVID 19 hospitalized pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.80 [0.54, 1.16]< 157%9 studies (9/-)88.2 %some concernnot evaluable moderatecrucial-
death or transfer to ICU 0.65 [0.35, 1.22]< 10%1 study (1/-)90.9 %NAnot evaluable crucial-
deaths 0.83 [0.64, 1.07]< 148%22 studies (22/-)92.9 %lowlow highcrucial-
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.83 [0.64, 1.07]< 10%6 studies (6/-)92.4 %some concernserious moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.73 [0.54, 1.01]< 141%4 studies (4/-)97.3 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
clinical improvement 1.05 [0.96, 1.15]> 114%9 studies (9/-)84.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.01 [0.79, 1.29]> 10%1 study (1/-)53.2 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (28-day) 1.77 [0.94, 3.32]> 135%3 studies (3/-)96.3 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 0.98 [0.76, 1.26]> 10%2 studies (2/-)43.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.01 [0.92, 1.12]> 10%5 studies (5/-)61.0 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
death or ventilation 0.68 [0.50, 0.92]< 10%3 studies (3/-)99.3 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
hospital discharge 1.11 [0.93, 1.34]> 138%4 studies (4/-)87.5 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
hospitalization 1.00 [0.14, 7.34]< 10%1 study (1/-)50.0 %NAnot evaluable important-
mechanical ventilation 1.03 [0.53, 2.00]< 10%2 studies (2/-)46.4 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
Recovery (time to event analysis only) 1.02 [0.81, 1.28]> 10%1 study (1/-)56.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
viral clearance 0.81 [0.56, 1.18]> 10%1 study (1/-)13.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
viral clearance (time to event analysis only) 0.81 [0.56, 1.18]> 10%1 study (1/-)13.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
ICU admission 0.60 [0.33, 1.10]< 10%2 studies (2/-)95.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
off oxygenation 0.26 [0.02, 2.88]> 10%1 study (1/-)13.8 %NAnot evaluable non important-
recovery 1.12 [0.97, 1.28]> 17%4 studies (4/-)94.3 %lownot evaluable highnon important-

safety endpoints 00

composite safety outcome 1.56 [0.78, 3.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)10.3 %NAnot evaluable important-
serious adverse events 0.97 [0.71, 1.33]< 110%4 studies (4/-)57.8 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
adverse events 1.33 [0.63, 2.78]< 10%1 study (1/-)22.7 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.