potential COVID-19 treatments - versus standard of care - for COVID-19 severe or critically pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 1.07 [0.86, 1.34]< 10%14 studies (14/-)27.5 %some concernlow moderatecrucial-
deaths 0.88 [0.79, 0.99]< 14%28 studies (28/-)98.7 %some concernlow moderatecrucial-
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.89 [0.66, 1.20]< 147%5 studies (5/-)78.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.63 [0.45, 0.88]< 10%4 studies (4/-)99.6 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement 1.29 [0.95, 1.75]> 174%10 studies (10/-)95.0 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.11 [0.72, 1.70]> 173%6 studies (6/-)67.8 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (28-day) 1.23 [0.83, 1.82]> 158%7 studies (7/-)84.5 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 1.74 [0.70, 4.33]> 162%4 studies (4/-)88.4 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.48 [1.16, 1.89]> 18%6 studies (6/-)99.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
death or ventilation 0.93 [0.35, 2.49]< 163%2 studies (2/-)55.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
hospital discharge 0.80 [0.55, 1.16]> 156%3 studies (3/-)11.6 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation 1.03 [0.66, 1.62]< 10%8 studies (8/-)44.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation (time to event analysis only) 0.66 [0.25, 1.72]< 10%1 study (1/-)80.2 %NAnot evaluable important-
radiologic improvement (14-day) 3.53 [1.19, 10.46]> 10%2 studies (2/-)98.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance 6.97 [0.23, 210.35]> 189%2 studies (2/-)86.4 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 14 7.68 [0.34, 173.70]> 190%2 studies (2/-)89.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
ICU admission 0.69 [0.43, 1.10]< 10%6 studies (6/-)94.2 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
recovery 0.64 [0.14, 2.92]> 10%1 study (1/-)28.3 %NAnot evaluable non important-

safety endpoints 00

related SAE (TRSAE) 1.24 [0.50, 3.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)32.0 %NAnot evaluable important-
serious adverse events 1.16 [0.86, 1.55]< 137%10 studies (10/-)16.4 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
superinfection 0.18 [0.02, 1.59]< 10%1 study (1/-)93.8 %NAnot evaluable important-
adverse events 1.14 [0.92, 1.43]< 10%4 studies (4/-)11.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
long QT 0.90 [0.56, 1.43]< 10%1 study (1/-)67.1 %NAnot evaluable non important-
renal impairment 1.44 [0.99, 2.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)3.0 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.