ivermectin - versus standard of care - for COVID-19 mild to moderate pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.49 [0.01, 26.05]< 10%1 study (1/-)63.4 %NAnot evaluable crucial-
deaths 0.24 [0.02, 2.65]< 10%2 studies (2/-)87.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.44 [0.23, 0.84]< 10%1 study (1/-)99.4 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement 1.89 [1.06, 3.38]> 10%1 study (1/-)98.4 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (7-day) 1.93 [1.27, 2.93]> 10%1 study (1/-)99.9 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.89 [1.06, 3.38]> 10%1 study (1/-)98.4 %NAnot evaluable important-

safety endpoints 00

serious adverse events 2.14 [0.21, 21.56]< 10%2 studies (2/-)26.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
adverse events 3.80 [0.36, 40.08]< 159%2 studies (2/-)13.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.