antiviral and associated therapy - versus standard of care - for COVID 19 hospitalized pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 1.02 [0.95, 1.10]< 10%13 studies (13/-)27.2 %some concernlow moderatecrucial-
death or transfer to ICU 1.09 [0.99, 1.20]< 10%1 study (1/-)4.0 %NAnot evaluable crucial-
deaths 0.99 [0.94, 1.04]< 10%50 studies (50/-)66.1 %some concerncritical moderatecrucial-
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.98 [0.89, 1.07]< 130%10 studies (10/-)67.0 %some concernlow moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.80 [0.61, 1.05]< 11%10 studies (10/-)94.6 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
clinical improvement 1.17 [0.95, 1.43]> 156%15 studies (15/-)93.2 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.06 [0.87, 1.31]> 154%15 studies (15/-)72.2 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (21-day) 2.09 [0.04, 119.96]> 10%1 study (1/-)63.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (28-day) 1.31 [0.97, 1.76]> 166%6 studies (6/-)96.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 1.29 [1.05, 1.60]> 136%10 studies (10/-)99.1 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.24 [1.05, 1.46]> 147%8 studies (8/-)99.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
death or ventilation 1.03 [0.93, 1.14]< 163%4 studies (4/-)30.4 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
hospital discharge 0.96 [0.85, 1.08]> 169%7 studies (7/-)24.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation 0.88 [0.69, 1.11]< 142%17 studies (17/-)85.8 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation (time to event analysis only) 0.06 [0.01, 0.83]< 10%1 study (1/-)98.2 %NAnot evaluable important-
radiologic improvement (14-day) 1.17 [0.42, 3.26]> 116%3 studies (3/-)62.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
radiologic improvement (7-day) 0.40 [0.02, 6.97]> 177%3 studies (3/-)26.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance 1.35 [0.95, 1.92]> 153%11 studies (11/-)95.1 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
viral clearance (time to event analysis only) 1.12 [0.87, 1.44]> 132%4 studies (4/-)80.3 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 14 0.99 [0.93, 1.06]> 10%9 studies (9/-)40.4 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 7 1.50 [0.78, 2.89]> 170%8 studies (8/-)88.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
ICU admission 0.82 [0.55, 1.23]< 136%9 studies (9/-)82.8 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
recovery 1.18 [1.02, 1.36]> 10%4 studies (4/-)98.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-

safety endpoints 00

cardiac arrest 1.92 [0.35, 10.49]< 10%1 study (1/-)22.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
related SAE (TRSAE) 1.24 [0.50, 3.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)32.0 %NAnot evaluable important-
serious adverse events 0.96 [0.75, 1.24]< 10%16 studies (16/-)61.6 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
acute kidney injury 1.18 [0.44, 3.18]< 10%1 study (1/-)37.2 %NAnot evaluable non important-
adverse events 1.72 [1.34, 2.23]< 151%15 studies (15/-)0.0 %some concerncritical moderatenon important-
arrhythmia 0.91 [0.72, 1.15]< 10%3 studies (3/-)78.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
elevated liver enzymes 3.48 [1.40, 8.64]< 10%1 study (1/-)0.4 %NAnot evaluable non important-
long QT 2.39 [0.24, 23.87]< 180%2 studies (2/-)23.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
renal impairment 1.43 [1.00, 2.05]< 10%2 studies (2/-)2.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
severe adverse events 1.00 [0.02, 51.70]< 10%1 study (1/-)50.0 %NAnot evaluable non important-

AE of interest endpoints 00

Thromboembolic events 0.89 [0.31, 2.55]< 10%1 study (1/-)58.6 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.