potential COVID-19 treatments - versus standard of care - for COVID 19 outpatients pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.42 [0.01, 12.75]< 10%1 study (1/-)68.7 %NAnot evaluable crucial-
deaths 1.33 [0.34, 5.28]< 10%7 studies (7/-)34.2 %some concernnot evaluable moderatecrucial-
hospitalization or death 0.85 [0.63, 1.14]< 10%3 studies (3/-)86.4 %some concernnot evaluable moderatecrucial-
A EFFACER PCR-negative (end of follow-up) 0.91 [0.57, 1.46]> 10%1 study (1/-)34.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical deterioration 0.25 [0.07, 0.84]< 10%2 studies (2/-)98.8 %highnot evaluable lowimportant-
clinical improvement 1.15 [1.06, 1.26]> 10%5 studies (5/-)100.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.50 [0.69, 3.24]> 10%1 study (1/-)84.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (28-day) 8.71 [1.99, 38.12]> 10%1 study (1/-)99.8 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (7-day) 3.14 [0.60, 16.38]> 10%1 study (1/-)91.2 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.08 [0.95, 1.23]> 10%1 study (1/-)87.9 %NAnot evaluable important-
hospitalization 0.95 [0.66, 1.38]< 10%8 studies (8/-)59.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation 0.88 [0.42, 1.85]< 10%2 studies (2/-)62.8 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance 0.47 [0.04, 5.69]> 10%1 study (1/-)27.9 %NAnot evaluable important-
ICU admission 0.59 [0.29, 1.18]< 10%2 studies (2/-)93.2 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
recovery 1.08 [0.83, 1.40]> 175%2 studies (2/-)70.8 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-

safety endpoints 00

adverse events 178.20 [73.71, 430.85]< 10%1 study (1/-)0.0 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.