potential COVID-19 treatments - versus standard of care - for COVID-19 severe or critically pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.98 [0.81, 1.19]< 10%19 studies (19/-)57.6 %some concernlow moderatecrucial-
deaths 0.81 [0.71, 0.92]< 124%40 studies (40/-)99.9 %some concerncritical moderatecrucial-
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.77 [0.58, 1.02]< 164%9 studies (9/-)96.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.63 [0.45, 0.88]< 10%4 studies (4/-)99.6 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement 1.36 [1.07, 1.72]> 170%15 studies (15/-)99.4 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.18 [0.87, 1.62]> 172%9 studies (9/-)85.4 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (28-day) 1.23 [0.83, 1.82]> 158%7 studies (7/-)84.5 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 1.74 [0.70, 4.33]> 162%4 studies (4/-)88.4 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.41 [1.13, 1.75]> 16%7 studies (7/-)99.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
death or ventilation 1.31 [0.69, 2.46]< 156%4 studies (4/-)20.4 %highnot evaluable lowimportant-
hospital discharge 0.92 [0.60, 1.40]> 162%4 studies (4/-)35.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation 0.99 [0.70, 1.39]< 10%12 studies (12/-)53.3 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation (time to event analysis only) 0.66 [0.25, 1.72]< 10%1 study (1/-)80.2 %NAnot evaluable important-
radiologic improvement (14-day) 3.53 [1.19, 10.46]> 10%2 studies (2/-)98.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance 6.97 [0.23, 210.35]> 189%2 studies (2/-)86.4 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 14 7.68 [0.34, 173.70]> 190%2 studies (2/-)89.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
ICU admission 0.78 [0.47, 1.31]< 120%7 studies (7/-)82.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
off oxygenation 8.57 [1.43, 51.36]> 10%1 study (1/-)99.0 %NAnot evaluable non important-
recovery 0.64 [0.14, 2.92]> 10%1 study (1/-)28.3 %NAnot evaluable non important-

safety endpoints 00

related SAE (TRSAE) 1.24 [0.50, 3.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)32.0 %NAnot evaluable important-
serious adverse events 1.19 [0.91, 1.56]< 126%13 studies (13/-)10.6 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
superinfection 0.77 [0.06, 9.89]< 176%2 studies (2/-)57.8 %highnot evaluable lowimportant-
adverse events 1.14 [0.92, 1.43]< 10%4 studies (4/-)11.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
long QT 0.90 [0.56, 1.43]< 10%1 study (1/-)67.1 %NAnot evaluable non important-
renal impairment 1.44 [0.99, 2.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)3.0 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.