published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

neutralizing antibody in COVID 19 outpatients - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias death D28detailed resultsCOMET-ICE, 2021 0.25 [0.01; 5.55] 0.25[0.01; 5.55]COMET-ICE, 202110%1,057NAnot evaluable deathsdetailed resultsBLAZE-1 phase 3 (combo), 2021 0.05 [0.00; 0.84] COMET-ICE, 2021 0.25 [0.01; 5.55] Cov-2067 Weinreich (1200mg) Cohort 1, 2020 0.45 [0.05; 3.82] Cov-2069 (Cohort B: positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test result), 2021 1.01 [0.02; 51.05] 0.26[0.06; 1.04]BLAZE-1 phase 3 (combo), 2021, COMET-ICE, 2021, Cov-2067 Weinreich (1200mg) Cohort 1, 2020, Cov-2069 (Cohort B: positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test result), 202140%5,073moderatenot evaluable hospitalization or deathdetailed resultsBLAZE-1 phase 2 (combination with etesevimab), 2020 0.15 [0.02; 1.18] BLAZE-1 phase 2 (monotherapy), 2020 0.16 [0.02; 1.31] BLAZE-1 phase 3 (combo), 2021 0.29 [0.15; 0.58] COMET-ICE, 2021 0.21 [0.09; 0.49] Cov-2067 Weinreich (1200mg) Cohort 1, 2020 0.29 [0.12; 0.68] 0.25[0.16; 0.39]BLAZE-1 phase 2 (combination with etesevimab), 2020, BLAZE-1 phase 2 (monotherapy), 2020, BLAZE-1 phase 3 (combo), 2021, COMET-ICE, 2021, Cov-2067 Weinreich (1200mg) Cohort 1, 202050%4,101moderatenot evaluable clinical deteriorationdetailed resultsCOMET-ICE, 2021 0.24 [0.10; 0.56] 0.24[0.10; 0.56]COMET-ICE, 202110%1,057NAnot evaluable hospitalizationdetailed resultsCOMET-ICE, 2021 0.20 [0.08; 0.48] Cov-2069 (Cohort B: positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test result), 2021 0.08 [0.00; 1.49] 0.18[0.08; 0.43]COMET-ICE, 2021, Cov-2069 (Cohort B: positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test result), 202120%1,261lownot evaluable symptomatic Covid-19detailed resultsCov-2069 (Cohort B: positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test result), 2021 0.56 [0.31; 1.00] 0.56[0.31; 1.00]Cov-2069 (Cohort B: positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test result), 202110%204NAnot evaluable viral clearance detailed resultsBLAZE-1 phase 2 (combination with etesevimab), 2020 1.65 [0.91; 3.00] BLAZE-1 phase 2 (monotherapy), 2020 0.67 [0.33; 1.38] 1.08[0.45; 2.60]BLAZE-1 phase 2 (combination with etesevimab), 2020, BLAZE-1 phase 2 (monotherapy), 2020272%470moderatenot evaluable viral clearance by day 7detailed resultsBLAZE-1 phase 2 (combination with etesevimab), 2020 1.31 [0.61; 2.83] BLAZE-1 phase 2 (monotherapy), 2020 0.91 [0.39; 2.09] 1.11[0.63; 1.95]BLAZE-1 phase 2 (combination with etesevimab), 2020, BLAZE-1 phase 2 (monotherapy), 202020%489moderatenot evaluable emergent treatment-resistant variantsdetailed resultsBLAZE-1 phase 2 (combination with etesevimab), 2020 0.18 [0.02; 1.51] BLAZE-1 phase 2 (monotherapy), 2020 1.52 [0.51; 4.47] 0.64[0.08; 4.94]BLAZE-1 phase 2 (combination with etesevimab), 2020, BLAZE-1 phase 2 (monotherapy), 2020267%497moderatenot evaluable serious adverse eventsdetailed resultsCov-2069 (Cohort B: positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test result), 2021 0.25 [0.03; 2.23] 0.25[0.03; 2.23]Cov-2069 (Cohort B: positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test result), 202110%311NAnot evaluable adverse eventsdetailed resultsCOMET-ICE, 2021 0.91 [0.68; 1.22] Cov-2069 (Cohort B: positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test result), 2021 0.55 [0.34; 0.86] 0.73[0.44; 1.20]COMET-ICE, 2021, Cov-2069 (Cohort B: positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test result), 2021271%1,360lownot evaluable0.02.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-04-26 15:56 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 97 - treatments: 729,887,742,878,975,570,771,888,1141,690,880,1255 - roots T: 290