published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

ivermectin in COVID 19 outpatients - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias Emergency room visit or hospitalizationdetailed resultsACTIV-6 (ivermectine), 2023 0.94 [0.58; 1.53] COVID-OUT (ivermectin), 2022 1.39 [0.72; 2.69] 1.08[0.73; 1.60]ACTIV-6 (ivermectine), 2023, COVID-OUT (ivermectin), 202220%2,006lownot evaluable deathsdetailed resultsACTIV-6 (ivermectine), 2023 2.01 [0.07; 59.98] IVERCORCOVID19 (Vallejos), 2020 1.34 [0.30; 6.03] Lopez-Medina, 2021 0.50 [0.02; 14.95] TOGETHER (ivermectine), 2022 0.87 [0.48; 1.58] 0.93[0.54; 1.59]ACTIV-6 (ivermectine), 2023, IVERCORCOVID19 (Vallejos), 2020, Lopez-Medina, 2021, TOGETHER (ivermectine), 202240%3,465lownot evaluable hospitalization or deathdetailed resultsACTIV 6 ivermectin, 2022 1.05 [0.43; 2.61] COVID-OUT (ivermectin), 2022 0.73 [0.19; 2.79] IVERCORCOVID19 (Vallejos), 2020 0.66 [0.33; 1.30] 0.77[0.47; 1.28]ACTIV 6 ivermectin, 2022, COVID-OUT (ivermectin), 2022, IVERCORCOVID19 (Vallejos), 202030%2,892lownot evaluable clinical deteriorationdetailed resultsCOVID-OUT (ivermectin), 2022 1.05 [0.76; 1.45] Lopez-Medina, 2021 0.56 [0.16; 1.95] TOGETHER (ivermectine), 2022 0.90 [0.70; 1.16] 0.94[0.77; 1.15]COVID-OUT (ivermectin), 2022, Lopez-Medina, 2021, TOGETHER (ivermectine), 202230%2,556lownot evaluable clinical improvementdetailed resultsACTIV 6 ivermectin, 2022 1.07 [0.97; 1.18] Lopez-Medina, 2021 1.07 [0.87; 1.32] 1.07[0.98; 1.17]ACTIV 6 ivermectin, 2022, Lopez-Medina, 202120%1,991lownot evaluable clinical improvement (21-day)detailed resultsLopez-Medina, 2021 1.28 [0.79; 2.10] 1.28[0.79; 2.10]Lopez-Medina, 202110%400NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (28-day)detailed resultsACTIV 6 ivermectin, 2022 1.07 [0.97; 1.18] 1.07[0.97; 1.18]ACTIV 6 ivermectin, 202210%1,591NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (time to event analysis only)detailed resultsACTIV 6 ivermectin, 2022 1.07 [0.97; 1.18] Lopez-Medina, 2021 1.07 [0.87; 1.32] 1.07[0.98; 1.17]ACTIV 6 ivermectin, 2022, Lopez-Medina, 202120%1,991lownot evaluable hospitalizationdetailed resultsACTIV-6 (ivermectine), 2023 2.01 [0.37; 11.03] Buonfrate (COVER-HIGH DOSE ARM C), 2022 6.33 [0.30; 132.38] COVID-OUT (ivermectin), 2022 0.73 [0.19; 2.79] IVERCORCOVID19 (Vallejos), 2020 0.65 [0.32; 1.32] TOGETHER (ivermectine), 2022 0.81 [0.59; 1.11] 0.81[0.61; 1.07]ACTIV-6 (ivermectine), 2023, Buonfrate (COVER-HIGH DOSE ARM C), 2022, COVID-OUT (ivermectin), 2022, IVERCORCOVID19 (Vallejos), 2020, TOGETHER (ivermectine), 202250%3,924lownot evaluable mechanical ventilationdetailed resultsIVERCORCOVID19 (Vallejos), 2020 1.34 [0.30; 6.03] 1.34[0.30; 6.03]IVERCORCOVID19 (Vallejos), 202010%501NAnot evaluable Recovery (time to event analysis only)detailed resultsACTIV-6 (ivermectine), 2023 1.02 [0.92; 1.13] Buonfrate (COVER-HIGH DOSE ARM C), 2022 0.79 [0.42; 1.48] 1.01[0.92; 1.12]ACTIV-6 (ivermectine), 2023, Buonfrate (COVER-HIGH DOSE ARM C), 202220%1,270lownot evaluable viral clearance detailed resultsChaccour, 2020 0.92 [0.77; 1.09] 0.92[0.77; 1.09]Chaccour, 202010%24NAnot evaluable viral clearance by day 14detailed resultsIVERCORCOVID19 (Vallejos), 2020 0.76 [0.45; 1.28] 0.76[0.45; 1.28]IVERCORCOVID19 (Vallejos), 202010%501NAnot evaluable viral clearance by day 7detailed resultsChaccour, 2020 0.92 [0.77; 1.09] TOGETHER (ivermectine), 2022 0.99 [0.59; 1.67] 0.93[0.79; 1.09]Chaccour, 2020, TOGETHER (ivermectine), 202220%331lownot evaluable serious adverse eventsdetailed resultsLopez-Medina, 2021 1.00 [0.14; 7.17] 1.00[0.14; 7.17]Lopez-Medina, 202110%400NAnot evaluable adverse eventsdetailed resultsChaccour, 2020 1.00 [0.20; 5.07] 1.00[0.20; 5.07]Chaccour, 202010%24NAnot evaluable0.52.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-04-27 06:23 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 97 - treatments: 684,886 - roots T: 290