published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

Vitamins in COVID-19 severe or critically - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias death D28detailed resultsZhang, 2020 0.50 [0.17; 1.50] 0.50[0.17; 1.50]Zhang, 202010%56NAnot evaluable deathsdetailed resultsCao, 2020 0.15 [0.01; 3.29] COVID-VIT-D, 2022 1.48 [0.75; 2.92] Jamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021 1.00 [0.19; 5.40] Kumari, 2020 0.60 [0.22; 1.64] Zhang, 2020 0.50 [0.17; 1.50] 0.84[0.47; 1.49]Cao, 2020, COVID-VIT-D, 2022, Jamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021, Kumari, 2020, Zhang, 2020521%850moderatenot evaluable deaths (time to event analysis only)detailed resultsZhang, 2020 0.50 [0.17; 1.50] 0.50[0.17; 1.50]Zhang, 202010%56NAnot evaluable clinical deteriorationdetailed resultsCao, 2020 0.11 [0.01; 2.21] Zhang, 2020 0.87 [0.23; 3.27] 0.49[0.08; 3.03]Cao, 2020, Zhang, 2020235%97moderatenot evaluable clinical improvementdetailed resultsCao, 2020 1.67 [0.84; 3.33] 1.67[0.84; 3.33]Cao, 202010%42NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (14-day)detailed resultsCao, 2020 2.00 [0.58; 6.94] 2.00[0.58; 6.94]Cao, 202010%41NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (21-day)detailed resultsCao, 2020 1.50 [0.22; 10.08] 1.50[0.22; 10.08]Cao, 202010%41NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (7-day)detailed resultsCao, 2020 2.38 [0.38; 14.70] 2.38[0.38; 14.70]Cao, 202010%41NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (time to event analysis only)detailed resultsCao, 2020 1.67 [0.84; 3.33] 1.67[0.84; 3.33]Cao, 202010%42NAnot evaluable mechanical ventilationdetailed resultsJamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021 1.30 [0.31; 5.40] Kumari, 2020 0.76 [0.33; 1.76] 0.87[0.42; 1.80]Jamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021, Kumari, 202020%210lownot evaluable radiologic improvement (14-day)detailed resultsCao, 2020 5.54 [1.01; 30.50] 5.54[1.01; 30.50]Cao, 202010%41NAnot evaluable serious adverse eventsdetailed resultsCao, 2020 0.11 [0.01; 2.21] 0.11[0.01; 2.21]Cao, 202010%41NAnot evaluable adverse eventsdetailed resultsCao, 2020 1.60 [0.38; 6.81] 1.60[0.38; 6.81]Cao, 202010%41NAnot evaluable0.010.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-05-09 03:15 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 91 - treatments: 1244,523,885,734,1439 - roots T: 290