published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

Vitamin D in COVID 19 outpatients - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias viral clearance detailed resultsOut of scaleEspitia-Hernandez, 2020 715.00 [12.94; 39513.71] 715.00[12.94; 39513.71]Espitia-Hernandez, 202010%35NAnot evaluable0.5500.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-05-27 01:29 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 97 - treatments: 734,1439 - roots T: 290