Network meta-analysis for deaths_(OS)

Network meta-analysis estimations pool direct and indirect evidences. These results should be considered as exploratory given the absence of assessment of transitivity assumption plausibility. Calculations by netmeta package.

Evidence network for deaths_(OS)

2IMpassion-132 (ITT population), 2024 TBCRC, 20241Alice, 20222KEYNOTE-119 (all population), 2019 KEYNOTE-119 (all population) DUPLICATE, 20191OlympiAD, 2017olaparib vs. pembrolizumab alone 0.93 [0.66; 1.30]0.93 [0.66;1.30]olaparib vs. pembrolizumab alone 0.93 [0.66; 1.30]olaparib vs. Standard of Care (SoC) 0.90 [0.66; 1.23]0.90 [0.66;1.23]olaparib vs. Standard of Care (SoC) 0.90 [0.66; 1.23]pembrolizumab alone vs. olaparib 1.08 [0.77; 1.50]1.08 [0.77;1.50]pembrolizumab alone vs. olaparib 1.08 [0.77; 1.50]pembrolizumab alone vs. Standard of Care (SoC) 0.97 [0.86; 1.09]0.97 [0.86;1.09]pembrolizumab alone vs. Standard of Care (SoC) 0.97 [0.86; 1.09]Standard of Care (SoC) vs. olaparib 1.11 [0.81; 1.52]1.11 [0.81;1.52]Standard of Care (SoC) vs. olaparib 1.11 [0.81; 1.52]Standard of Care (SoC) vs. pembrolizumab alone 1.03 [0.91; 1.16]1.03 [0.91;1.16]Standard of Care (SoC) vs. pembrolizumab alone 1.03 [0.91; 1.16]Standard of Care (SoC)carboplatingemcitabinepegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamidepembrolizumab aloneatezolizumab based treatmentolaparibdirect evidencenetwork meta-analysis
T vs. C Standard of Care (SoC)carboplatingemcitabinepegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamidepembrolizumab aloneatezolizumab based treatmentolaparib
Standard of Care (SoC)---NANANA1.03
0.91; 1.16
NA1.11
0.81; 1.52
carboplatinNA---NANANANANA
gemcitabineNANA---NANANANA
pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamideNANANA---NANANA
pembrolizumab alone0.97
0.86; 1.09
NANANA---NA1.08
0.77; 1.50
atezolizumab based treatmentNANANANANA---NA
olaparib0.90
0.66; 1.23
NANANA0.93
0.66; 1.30
NA---

pathologies: 140 - treatments: 483 result logic