benefit
(statisticaly significant)
benefit (nominaly significant, not statitically demonstrated) NS not significant harm statitically significant NS harm not significant low certainty due to bias
 
deaths (OS)progression or deaths (PFS)RFS/DFS

mML - NA - all population metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - (neo)adjuvant (NA) mML - NA - all population

versus Ipilimumab (10 mg/kg)
nivolumab alone vs. Ipilimumab (10 mg/kg) 1 NS--35%
versus placebo
nivolumab alone vs. placebo 1 ---44%
pembrolizumab alone vs. placebo 1 ---43%

mML - NA - PDL1 positive metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - (neo)adjuvant (NA) mML - NA - PDL1 positive

versus placebo
pembrolizumab alone vs. placebo 1 ---46%

mML - L1 - all population metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - 1st line (L1) mML - L1 - all population

versus ipilimumab alone
nivolumab alone vs. ipilimumab alone 1 -37%-43%-
versus ipilimumab followed by nivolumab
nivolumab followed by ipilimumab vs. ipilimumab followed by nivolumab 1 -52%--

mML - L1 - BRAF mutant metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - 1st line (L1) mML - L1 - BRAF mutant

versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus SoC vs. placebo plus SoC 1 NS-22%-

mML - L1 - BRAF wild metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - 1st line (L1) mML - L1 - BRAF wild

versus dacarbazine
nivolumab alone vs. dacarbazine 1 -58%-57%-
versus pembrolizumab alone
atezolizumab plus cometinib vs. pembrolizumab alone 1 NSNS-

mML - L2 - all population metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - 2nd line (L2) mML - L2 - all population

versus ipilimumab alone
pembrolizumab (10mg/kg) vs. ipilimumab alone 1 -31%-42%-
pembrolizumab (10mg/kg) 2 weeks vs. ipilimumab alone 1 -37%-42%-
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
nivolumab alone vs. Standard of Care (SoC) 1 NSNS-
pembrolizumab (10mg/kg) vs. Standard of Care (SoC) 1 -26%-50%-
pembrolizumab (2mg/kg) vs. Standard of Care (SoC) 1 NS-43%-

mML - L2 - BRAF mutant metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - 2nd line (L2) mML - L2 - BRAF mutant

versus placebo plus SoC
pembrolizumab plus SoC vs. placebo plus SoC 1 NSNS-