Study study type PathologyT1T0Patientssample sizesROB Results deaths (OS) Eprogression or deaths (PFS) ERFS/DFS E

mUC - L1 - all population metastatic/advanced UC (mUC) - 1st Line (L1) mUC - L1 - all population

versus gemcitabine plus platin
atezolizumab alone
IMvigor-130 (At-arm B vs Ch-armC), 2020
  NCT02807636
RCTmUC - L1 - all populationatezolizumab (B)chemotherapy (C) gemcitabine plus platinepatients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma360 / 400some concern
inconclusive 2%
durvalumab alone
DANUBE (D vs C - all population), 2020
  NCT02516241
RCTmUC - L1 - all populationdurvalumabplatine based chemotherpy (SOC) cisplatine plus gemcitabinefirst line in Patients with Stage IV Urothelial Cancer.346 / 344some concern
inconclusive -1% -23%
pembrolizumab plus SoC
KEYNOTE-361 (PC vs C), 2021
  NCT02853305
RCTmUC - L1 - all populationpembrolizumab plus chemotherapychemotherapy alone (cisplatine or carbo plus gemcitabine)patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable/metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who received no prior systemic chemotherapy for advanced urothelial cancer351 / 352some concern
inconclusive -14% -22%
versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus SoC
IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020
  NCT02807636
RCTmUC - L1 - all populationatezolizumab (A) plus gemcitabine and platineplacebo (C) plus gemcitabine and platinepatients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma451 / 400some concern
conclusif -17% demonstrated-18%
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-361 (P vs C), 2021
  NCT02853305
RCTmUC - L1 - all populationpembrolizumabchemotherapy alone (cisplatine or carbo plus gemcitabine)patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable/metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who received no prior systemic chemotherapy for advanced urothelial cancer307 / 352some concern
inconclusive -8% 35%

mUC - L1 - PDL1 positive metastatic/advanced UC (mUC) - 1st Line (L1) mUC - L1 - PDL1 positive

versus gemcitabine plus platin
durvalumab alone
DANUBE (D vs C - PDL1>25%), 2020
  NCT02516241
RCTmUC - L1 - PDL1 positivedurvalumabplatine based chemotherapy (gemcitabine)first line in Patients with Stage IV Urothelial Cancer whose tumours express high levels of PD-L1.209 / 207some concern
inconclusive -11% 24%

mUC - L2 - all population metastatic/advanced UC (mUC) - 2nd Line (L2) mUC - L2 - all population

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
atezolizumab alone
IMvigor-211 (all population), 2018
  NCT02302807
RCTmUC - L2 - all populationatezolizumabchemotherapypatients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) who have progressed during or following a platinum-containing regimen patients had received no more than two previous lines of therapy and had progressed during or following one or more platinum-containing regimens for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (or neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy with progression)467 / 464some concern
suggested -15% -11%
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-045 (all population), 2017
  NCT02256436
RCTmUC - L2 - all populationpembrolizumabchemotherapy (ICC) : paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinfluninepatients with advanced urothelial carcinoma that progressed during or after the receipt of platinumbased chemotherapy treated as second-line therapy270 / 272some concern
conclusif demonstrated-27% -2%

mUC - L2 - PDL1 positive metastatic/advanced UC (mUC) - 2nd Line (L2) mUC - L2 - PDL1 positive

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
atezolizumab alone
IMvigor-211 (PDL1>5%), 2018
  NCT02302807
RCTmUC - L2 - PDL1 positiveatezolizumabchemotherapypatients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) who have progressed during or following a platinum-containing regimen patients had received no more than two previous lines of therapy and had progressed during or following one or more platinum-containing regimens for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (or neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy with progression)116 / 118some concern
inconclusive -13% 1%
IMvigor-211 (PDL1>1%), 2018
  NCT02302807
RCTmUC - L2 - PDL1 positiveatezolizumabchemotherapypatients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) who have progressed during or following a platinum-containing regimen patients had received no more than two previous lines of therapy and had progressed during or following one or more platinum-containing regimens for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (or neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy with progression316 / 309some concern
suggested -13% -14%
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-045 (PDL1 CPS >10%), 2017
  NCT02256436
RCTmUC - L2 - PDL1 positivepembrolizumabchemotherapy (ICC)as second-line therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma that progressed during or after the receipt of platinumbased chemotherapy.=> only PDL1 CPS >10%74 / 90some concern
conclusif demonstrated-43% -11%

mUC - M - all population metastatic/advanced UC (mUC) - maintenance (M) mUC - M - all population

versus BSC
avelumab alone
JAVELIN Bladder 100 (all population), 2020
  NCT02603432
RCTmUC - M - all populationavelumabBSCas first line therapy, previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease did not progress on induction chemotherapy350 / 350some concern
conclusif demonstrated-31% -38%

mUC - M - PDL1 positive metastatic/advanced UC (mUC) - maintenance (M) mUC - M - PDL1 positive

versus BSC
avelumab alone
JAVELIN Bladder 100 (PDL1>25%), 2020
  NCT02603432
RCTmUC - M - PDL1 positiveavelumabno treatmentpreviously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease did not progress on induction chemotherapy189 / 169some concern
conclusif demonstrated-44% -44%

MIBC - NA - all population muscular invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) MIBC - (neo)adjuvant (NA) MIBC - NA - all population

versus no additional treatment
atezolizumab alone
IMvigor-010, 2021
  NCT02450331
RCTMIBC - (neo)adjuvant (NA)atezolizumabobservationpatients aged 18 years or older and had histologically confirmed muscle-invasiveurothelial carcinoma of either the bladder or the upper tract as Adjuvant Therapy (Participants With High-Risk Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma)406 / 403some concern
inconclusive -15%
versus placebo
nivolumab alone
CheckMate 274 (all population), 2017
  NCT02632409
RCTMIBC - NA - all populationnivolumabplaceboadjuvant therapy patients with muscle-invasive high-risk urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radicalsurgery353 / 356low
conclusif -28%

MIBC - NA - PDL1 positive muscular invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) MIBC - (neo)adjuvant (NA) MIBC - NA - PDL1 positive

versus placebo
nivolumab alone
CheckMate 274 (PDL1>1%), 2017
  NCT02632409
RCTMIBC - NA - PDL1 positivenivolumabplaceboadjuvant therapy patients with muscle-invasive high-risk urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radicalsurgery140 / 142low
conclusif -45%