Study | study type
|
Pathology | T1 | T0 | Patients | sample sizes | ROB | Results | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
la/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2) breast cancer - HR positive la/mBC - HR positive la/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
versus fulvestrant | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
palbociclib plus fulvestrant | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FLIPPER, 2021 NCT02690480 | RCT | la/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2) | palbociclib plus fulvestrant | placebo plus fulvestrant | Postmenauposal women with HR-positive and HER-negative advanced breast cancer | 94 / 95 | low | suggested |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PALOMA-3, 2016 NCT01942135 | RCT | la/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2) | palbociclib plus fulvestrant | placebo plus fulvestrant | Eligible patients were pre- or post menopausal with breast cancer and histologic or cytologicconfirmation of recurrent local or distant disease progression during or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant endocrinetherapy or while receiving or within 1 month after receivingendocrine therapy for MBC | 347 / 174 | low | conclusif |
|