published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

zinc in COVID-19 (hospitalized or not) - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deathsdetailed resultsAbd-Elsalam, 2020 0.99 [0.28; 3.53] 0.99[0.28; 3.53]Abd-Elsalam, 202010%191NAnot evaluable clinical improvementdetailed resultsAbd-Elsalam, 2020 1.08 [0.54; 2.15] 1.08[0.54; 2.15]Abd-Elsalam, 202010%191NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (28-day)detailed resultsAbd-Elsalam, 2020 1.08 [0.54; 2.15] 1.08[0.54; 2.15]Abd-Elsalam, 202010%191NAnot evaluable mechanical ventilationdetailed resultsAbd-Elsalam, 2020 0.64 [0.18; 2.36] 0.64[0.18; 2.36]Abd-Elsalam, 202010%191NAnot evaluable0.22.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-03-28 21:09 +01:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 87 - treatments: 814 - roots T: 290