published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

standard of care in COVID-19 severe or critically - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deathsdetailed resultsJamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021 (REV) 1.00 [0.19; 5.40] Kumari, 2020 (REV) 1.67 [0.61; 4.57] 1.46[0.61; 3.46]Jamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021 (REV), Kumari, 2020 (REV)20%210lownot evaluable mechanical ventilationdetailed resultsJamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021 (REV) 0.77 [0.19; 3.20] Kumari, 2020 (REV) 1.31 [0.57; 3.03] 1.14[0.56; 2.36]Jamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021 (REV), Kumari, 2020 (REV)20%210lownot evaluable0.52.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-05-09 09:59 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 91 - treatments: 651 - roots T: 651