published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

umifenovir (arbidol) in COVID-19 mild to moderate - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias clinical deteriorationdetailed resultsELACOI (Standard of care), 2020 0.86 [0.06; 11.36] 0.86[0.06; 11.36]ELACOI (Standard of care), 202010%23NAnot evaluable radiologic improvement (14-day)detailed resultsELACOI (Standard of care), 2020 0.18 [0.01; 3.99] 0.18[0.01; 3.99]ELACOI (Standard of care), 202010%21NAnot evaluable radiologic improvement (7-day)detailed resultsELACOI (Standard of care), 2020 0.08 [0.00; 1.71] 0.08[0.00; 1.71]ELACOI (Standard of care), 202010%21NAnot evaluable viral clearance detailed resultsELACOI (Standard of care), 2020 2.80 [0.31; 25.53] 2.80[0.31; 25.53]ELACOI (Standard of care), 202010%23NAnot evaluable viral clearance by day 14detailed resultsELACOI (Lopinavir/ritonavir), 2020 1.84 [0.40; 8.38] ELACOI (Standard of care), 2020 2.80 [0.31; 25.53] 2.10[0.60; 7.35]ELACOI (Lopinavir/ritonavir), 2020, ELACOI (Standard of care), 202020%92moderatenot evaluable viral clearance by day 7detailed resultsELACOI (Lopinavir/ritonavir), 2020 1.08 [0.41; 2.89] ELACOI (Standard of care), 2020 0.67 [0.10; 4.58] 0.98[0.41; 2.35]ELACOI (Lopinavir/ritonavir), 2020, ELACOI (Standard of care), 202020%92moderatenot evaluable severe COVID-19 occurrencedetailed resultsELACOI (Lopinavir/ritonavir), 2020 0.30 [0.07; 1.27] 0.30[0.07; 1.27]ELACOI (Lopinavir/ritonavir), 202010%69NAnot evaluable0.05.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-05-03 05:53 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 90 - treatments: 516 - roots T: 290