published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

first booster dose in COVID-19 prophylaxis (excluding children) - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deathsdetailed resultsUKHSA report week 12 (24 March 2022), 2022 0.12 [0.06; 0.24] 0.12[0.06; 0.24]UKHSA report week 12 (24 March 2022), 202210%NAnot evaluable deaths (time to event analysis only)detailed resultsUKHSA report week 12 (24 March 2022), 2022 0.12 [0.06; 0.24] 0.12[0.06; 0.24]UKHSA report week 12 (24 March 2022), 202210%NAnot evaluable confirmed COVID (any severity)detailed resultsAccorsi, 2022 0.35 [0.32; 0.38] England (Andrews), 2021 0.25 [0.14; 0.44] Mattiuzzi, 2022 0.15 [0.14; 0.17] Ontario (Buchan), 2022 0.63 [0.49; 0.80] Southern California (Tseng) - omicron, 2022 0.38 [0.32; 0.44] Tenforde, 2022 0.03 [0.01; 0.07] Thompson -VISIOn Network (omicron), 2022 0.18 [0.16; 0.21] 0.23[0.15; 0.35]Accorsi, 2022, England (Andrews), 2021, Mattiuzzi, 2022, Ontario (Buchan), 2022, Southern California (Tseng) - omicron, 2022, Tenforde, 2022, Thompson -VISIOn Network (omicron), 2022798%139,301NAnot evaluable hospitalizationdetailed resultsLauring, 2022 0.14 [0.09; 0.22] Mattiuzzi, 2022 0.15 [0.11; 0.20] Sisonke 2 (booster), 2021 0.15 [0.05; 0.45] Thompson -VISIOn Network (omicron), 2022 0.10 [0.05; 0.18] UKHSA report week 12 (24 March 2022), 2022 0.17 [0.11; 0.25] 0.15[0.12; 0.18]Lauring, 2022, Mattiuzzi, 2022, Sisonke 2 (booster), 2021, Thompson -VISIOn Network (omicron), 2022, UKHSA report week 12 (24 March 2022), 202250%11,690NAnot evaluable symptomatic Covid-19detailed resultsAccorsi, 2022 0.35 [0.32; 0.38] England (Andrews), 2021 0.25 [0.14; 0.44] Kirsebom (UKHSA), 2022 0.30 [0.29; 0.31] Thompson -VISIOn Network (omicron), 2022 0.18 [0.16; 0.21] 0.27[0.21; 0.34]Accorsi, 2022, England (Andrews), 2021, Kirsebom (UKHSA), 2022, Thompson -VISIOn Network (omicron), 2022495%131,448NAnot evaluable ICU admissiondetailed resultsMattiuzzi, 2022 0.07 [0.02; 0.25] 0.07[0.02; 0.25]Mattiuzzi, 202210%NAnot evaluable0.02.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-05-03 09:13 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 89 - treatments: 1088,1331,1330,1329,1344,1328,1327 - roots T: 290