published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

placebo in COVID-19 prophylaxis (excluding children) - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deathsdetailed resultsCOVID-PEP-Post exposure (Boulware), 2020 (REV) 1.02 [0.02; 51.39] PATCH-cohort 3 PreP (Abella), 2020 (REV) 1.00 [0.02; 51.16] 1.01[0.06; 16.22]COVID-PEP-Post exposure (Boulware), 2020 (REV), PATCH-cohort 3 PreP (Abella), 2020 (REV)20%953lownot evaluable hospitalizationdetailed resultsCOVID-PEP-Post exposure (Boulware), 2020 (REV) 1.02 [0.06; 16.32] Rojas-Serrano, 2021 (REV) 0.95 [0.02; 48.81] 1.00[0.10; 9.62]COVID-PEP-Post exposure (Boulware), 2020 (REV), Rojas-Serrano, 2021 (REV)20%948lownot evaluable symptomatic Covid-19detailed resultsBarnabas RV, 2020 (REV) 0.79 [0.49; 1.26] COVID PREP (HCQ 1x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV) 1.54 [0.43; 5.52] COVID PREP HCQ (2x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV) 0.85 [0.29; 2.51] COVID-PEP-Post exposure (Boulware), 2020 (REV) 1.19 [0.79; 1.80] HERO-HCQ (Naggie), 2021 (REV) 1.33 [0.87; 2.03] Rojas-Serrano, 2021 (REV) 6.20 [0.72; 53.10] 1.13[0.86; 1.48]Barnabas RV, 2020 (REV), COVID PREP (HCQ 1x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV), COVID PREP HCQ (2x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV), COVID-PEP-Post exposure (Boulware), 2020 (REV), HERO-HCQ (Naggie), 2021 (REV), Rojas-Serrano, 2021 (REV)614%5,113lownot evaluable asymptomatic COVID casedetailed resultsEPICOS (Polo), 2022 (REV) 1.04 [0.53; 2.05] 1.04[0.53; 2.05]EPICOS (Polo), 2022 (REV)10%454NAnot evaluable infection (PCR positive symptomatic or not)detailed resultsBarnabas RV, 2020 (REV) 0.91 [0.60; 1.37] COVID PREP (HCQ 1x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV) 1.37 [0.84; 2.23] COVID PREP HCQ (2x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV) 1.35 [0.83; 2.21] COVID-PEP-Post exposure (Boulware), 2020 (REV) 0.83 [0.34; 2.02] EPICOS (Polo), 2022 (REV) 1.15 [0.62; 2.14] HERO-HCQ (Naggie), 2021 (REV) 1.33 [0.87; 2.03] PATCH-cohort 3 PreP (Abella), 2020 (REV) 1.05 [0.25; 4.41] Rojas-Serrano, 2021 (REV) 6.20 [0.72; 53.10] 1.19[0.97; 1.45]Barnabas RV, 2020 (REV), COVID PREP (HCQ 1x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV), COVID PREP HCQ (2x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV), COVID-PEP-Post exposure (Boulware), 2020 (REV), EPICOS (Polo), 2022 (REV), HERO-HCQ (Naggie), 2021 (REV), PATCH-cohort 3 PreP (Abella), 2020 (REV), Rojas-Serrano, 2021 (REV)80%5,692lownot evaluable serious adverse eventsdetailed resultsBarnabas RV, 2020 (REV) 0.96 [0.14; 6.88] PATCH-cohort 3 PreP (Abella), 2020 (REV) 1.00 [0.02; 51.16] 0.97[0.17; 5.63]Barnabas RV, 2020 (REV), PATCH-cohort 3 PreP (Abella), 2020 (REV)20%961lownot evaluable adverse eventsdetailed resultsBarnabas RV, 2020 (REV) 0.63 [0.42; 0.95] COVID PREP (HCQ 1x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV) 1.69 [1.26; 2.26] COVID PREP HCQ (2x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV) 0.49 [0.37; 0.66] COVID-PEP-Post exposure (Boulware), 2020 (REV) 0.30 [0.21; 0.43] Rojas-Serrano, 2021 (REV) 0.61 [0.29; 1.28] 0.63[0.33; 1.21]Barnabas RV, 2020 (REV), COVID PREP (HCQ 1x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV), COVID PREP HCQ (2x week, Rajasingham), 2020 (REV), COVID-PEP-Post exposure (Boulware), 2020 (REV), Rojas-Serrano, 2021 (REV)594%3,633lownot evaluable0.22.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-05-23 07:08 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 89 - treatments: 650 - roots T: 650