published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

placebo in COVID-19 severe or critically - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deathsdetailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 0.91 [0.41; 2.03] 0.91[0.41; 2.03]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%236NAnot evaluable clinical deteriorationdetailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 1.05 [0.61; 1.82] 1.05[0.61; 1.82]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%237NAnot evaluable clinical improvementdetailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 0.81 [0.57; 1.15] 0.81[0.57; 1.15]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%237NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (14-day)detailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 0.83 [0.44; 1.56] 0.83[0.44; 1.56]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%236NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (28-day)detailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 0.73 [0.42; 1.27] 0.73[0.42; 1.27]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%236NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (7-day)detailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 1.01 [0.18; 5.66] 1.01[0.18; 5.66]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%236NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (time to event analysis only)detailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 0.81 [0.57; 1.15] 0.81[0.57; 1.15]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%237NAnot evaluable AE leading to drug discontinuationdetailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 0.41 [0.13; 1.26] 0.41[0.13; 1.26]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%233NAnot evaluable serious adverse eventsdetailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 1.56 [0.81; 3.00] 1.56[0.81; 3.00]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%233NAnot evaluable deep vein thrombosisdetailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 2.00 [0.12; 32.41] 2.00[0.12; 32.41]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%233NAnot evaluable elevated liver enzymesdetailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 2.76 [0.99; 7.71] 2.76[0.99; 7.71]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%233NAnot evaluable hyperbilirubinemiadetailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 0.92 [0.36; 2.36] 0.92[0.36; 2.36]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%233NAnot evaluable pulmonary embolismdetailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 2.00 [0.12; 32.41] 2.00[0.12; 32.41]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%233NAnot evaluable renal impairmentdetailed resultsCAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV) 0.99 [0.03; 29.94] 0.99[0.03; 29.94]CAP-China (Wang et al.), 2020 (REV)10%233NAnot evaluable0.25.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-08-10 21:47 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 91 - treatments: 650 - roots T: 650