anti-inflammatoty and immuno-therapy - versus potential COVID-19 treatments - for COVID-19 severe or critically pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.80 [0.63, 1.01]< 145%33 studies (32/1)97.0 %moderatecritical moderatecrucial-
death or transfer to ICU 0.90 [0.73, 1.10]< 118%2 studies (1/1)84.5 %NAnot evaluable crucial-
deaths 0.68 [0.53, 0.87]< 192%74 studies (54/20)99.9 %moderatecritical moderatecrucial-
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.83 [0.50, 1.38]< 196%17 studies (13/4)76.4 %moderatecritical moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.61 [0.44, 0.86]< 10%5 studies (5/-)99.8 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
clinical improvement 1.34 [1.14, 1.58]> 158%22 studies (22/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.43 [1.08, 1.91]> 151%8 studies (8/-)99.3 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (21-day) 1.50 [0.22, 10.08]> 10%1 study (1/-)66.1 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (28-day) 1.48 [1.06, 2.05]> 144%10 studies (9/1)99.0 %moderatecritical moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 2.39 [0.73, 7.80]> 145%3 studies (3/-)92.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.15 [1.00, 1.33]> 134%11 studies (11/-)97.7 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
death or ventilation 1.07 [0.74, 1.56]< 147%6 studies (6/-)35.6 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
hospital discharge 1.24 [0.92, 1.67]> 148%7 studies (6/1)92.1 %lowserious highimportant-
mechanical ventilation 0.87 [0.67, 1.12]< 10%16 studies (16/-)86.4 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation (time to event analysis only) 0.66 [0.25, 1.72]< 10%1 study (1/-)80.2 %NAnot evaluable important-
radiologic improvement (14-day) 4.02 [1.61, 10.05]> 10%3 studies (3/-)99.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance 6.97 [0.23, 210.35]> 189%2 studies (2/-)86.4 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 14 7.68 [0.34, 173.70]> 190%2 studies (2/-)89.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
ICU admission 0.53 [0.35, 0.83]< 146%9 studies (8/1)99.8 %moderatenot evaluable moderatenon important-
off oxygenation 1.65 [0.05, 50.02]> 181%2 studies (2/-)61.1 %highnot evaluable lownon important-
recovery 1.30 [0.64, 2.66]> 19%2 studies (2/-)76.5 %lownot evaluable highnon important-

safety endpoints 00

related AE (TRAE) 1.26 [0.14, 11.07]< 10%2 studies (2/-)41.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
serious adverse events 1.07 [0.87, 1.32]< 126%17 studies (17/-)24.7 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
superinfection 1.32 [0.48, 3.60]< 180%4 studies (3/1)29.6 %seriousnot evaluable lowimportant-
acute kidney injury 0.43 [0.14, 1.34]< 10%1 study (-/1)92.7 %NAnot evaluable non important-
adverse events 1.13 [0.96, 1.32]< 10%12 studies (12/-)7.0 %some concernlow moderatenon important-
arrhythmia 0.16 [0.03, 0.90]< 10%1 study (-/1)98.1 %NAnot evaluable non important-
elevated liver enzymes 0.52 [0.18, 1.51]< 10%1 study (-/1)88.5 %NAnot evaluable non important-
Myocardial infarction 0.87 [0.19, 3.92]< 10%1 study (-/1)57.2 %NAnot evaluable non important-
venous thromboembolism 5.23 [0.42, 65.62]< 10%1 study (-/1)10.2 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.