antiviral and associated therapy - versus control - for COVID-19 mild to moderate pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.56 [0.31, 1.02]< 10%5 studies (5/-)97.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderatecrucial-
deaths 0.65 [0.43, 0.97]< 10%14 studies (14/-)98.3 %some concerncritical moderatecrucial-
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.64 [0.28, 1.48]< 10%3 studies (3/-)85.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.98 [0.68, 1.41]< 137%7 studies (7/-)54.8 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement 1.33 [1.04, 1.71]> 154%9 studies (9/-)98.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.19 [0.97, 1.46]> 128%7 studies (7/-)95.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (21-day) 2.09 [0.04, 119.96]> 10%1 study (1/-)63.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (28-day) 1.47 [1.06, 2.04]> 159%4 studies (4/-)99.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 1.26 [0.97, 1.63]> 172%7 studies (7/-)95.7 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.28 [1.06, 1.54]> 154%7 studies (7/-)99.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
hospital discharge 1.20 [0.81, 1.77]> 159%4 studies (4/-)81.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation 0.59 [0.26, 1.32]< 152%8 studies (8/-)90.1 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation (time to event analysis only) 0.06 [0.01, 0.83]< 10%1 study (1/-)98.2 %NAnot evaluable important-
radiologic improvement (14-day) 1.17 [0.42, 3.26]> 116%3 studies (3/-)62.1 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
radiologic improvement (7-day) 0.09 [0.01, 0.78]> 10%2 studies (2/-)1.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance 1.50 [1.03, 2.19]> 169%8 studies (8/-)98.3 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
viral clearance (time to event analysis only) 1.32 [1.03, 1.69]> 10%2 studies (2/-)98.6 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 14 0.99 [0.93, 1.06]> 10%5 studies (5/-)41.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 7 1.01 [0.83, 1.23]> 137%7 studies (7/-)52.6 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
ICU admission 1.14 [0.75, 1.75]< 10%4 studies (4/-)27.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
recovery 1.15 [0.99, 1.33]> 10%2 studies (2/-)96.4 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-

safety endpoints 00

serious adverse events 0.76 [0.47, 1.23]< 10%10 studies (10/-)86.5 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
acute kidney injury 1.18 [0.44, 3.18]< 10%1 study (1/-)37.2 %NAnot evaluable non important-
adverse events 2.01 [1.33, 3.05]< 177%12 studies (12/-)0.1 %some concernlow moderatenon important-
arrhythmia 2.24 [0.23, 21.69]< 10%1 study (1/-)24.5 %NAnot evaluable non important-
elevated liver enzymes 3.48 [1.40, 8.64]< 10%1 study (1/-)0.4 %NAnot evaluable non important-
long QT 9.79 [1.27, 75.50]< 10%1 study (1/-)1.5 %NAnot evaluable non important-
renal impairment 1.35 [0.47, 3.86]< 10%1 study (1/-)28.8 %NAnot evaluable non important-

AE of interest endpoints 00

Thromboembolic events 0.89 [0.31, 2.55]< 10%1 study (1/-)58.6 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.