studies

mHCC - 1st line (L1), ... vs. VEGF(R) inhibitor, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsORIENT-32, 2021 (REV) 1.75 [1.33; 2.32] 1.75[1.33; 2.32]ORIENT-32, 2021 (REV)10%571NAnot evaluable AE (any grade)detailed resultsORIENT-32, 2021 (REV) 1.84 [0.95; 3.58] 1.84[0.95; 3.58]ORIENT-32, 2021 (REV)10%565NAnot evaluable AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsORIENT-32, 2021 (REV) 1.09 [0.76; 1.58] 1.09[0.76; 1.58]ORIENT-32, 2021 (REV)10%565NAnot evaluable AE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsORIENT-32, 2021 (REV) 0.34 [0.04; 2.83] 0.34[0.04; 2.83]ORIENT-32, 2021 (REV)10%565NAnot evaluable AE leading to treatment discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsORIENT-32, 2021 (REV) 0.40 [0.20; 0.78] 0.40[0.20; 0.78]ORIENT-32, 2021 (REV)10%565NAnot evaluable0.25.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-10-03 06:24 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 131 - treatments: 670