studies

lung cancer : non small cell (NSCLC), atezolizumab based treatment vs. non platinum-based chemotherapy, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.80 [0.70; 0.92] OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016 0.77 [0.64; 0.92] POPLAR, 2016 0.73 [0.53; 1.00] 0.78[0.71; 0.87]OAK (all population), 2016, OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016, POPLAR, 201630%2,196moderatenot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.96 [0.85; 1.08] OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016 0.87 [0.74; 1.03] POPLAR, 2016 0.94 [0.72; 1.23] 0.93[0.85; 1.02]OAK (all population), 2016, OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016, POPLAR, 201630%2,196moderatenot evaluable DORdetailed resultsOAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016 9.61 [3.07; 30.08] 9.61[3.07; 30.08]OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 201610%107NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 1.19 [0.85; 1.67] OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016 1.41 [0.93; 2.14] POPLAR, 2016 0.99 [0.52; 1.91] 1.23[0.96; 1.57]OAK (all population), 2016, OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016, POPLAR, 201630%2,196moderatenot evaluable AE (any grade)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.66 [0.39; 1.13] POPLAR, 2016 0.87 [0.26; 2.93] 0.69[0.42; 1.13]OAK (all population), 2016, POPLAR, 201620%1,464moderatenot evaluable AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.51 [0.41; 0.65] POPLAR, 2016 0.60 [0.38; 0.97] 0.53[0.43; 0.65]OAK (all population), 2016, POPLAR, 201620%1,464moderatenot evaluable AE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.67 [0.30; 1.53] POPLAR, 2016 1.15 [0.34; 3.85] 0.80[0.40; 1.57]OAK (all population), 2016, POPLAR, 201620%1,464moderatenot evaluable AE leading to treatment discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.58 [0.45; 0.75] POPLAR, 2016 0.29 [0.14; 0.61] 0.45[0.24; 0.87]OAK (all population), 2016, POPLAR, 2016266%1,464moderatenot evaluable SAE (any grade)detailed resultsPOPLAR, 2016 1.05 [0.64; 1.73] 1.05[0.64; 1.73]POPLAR, 201610%277NAnot evaluable SAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 1.03 [0.80; 1.31] 1.03[0.80; 1.31]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable TRAE (any grade)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.29 [0.22; 0.39] POPLAR, 2016 0.27 [0.15; 0.51] 0.29[0.22; 0.38]OAK (all population), 2016, POPLAR, 201620%1,464moderatenot evaluable TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.23 [0.18; 0.31] POPLAR, 2016 0.20 [0.11; 0.38] 0.23[0.18; 0.29]OAK (all population), 2016, POPLAR, 201620%1,464moderatenot evaluable TRAE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.47 [0.02; 14.16] POPLAR, 2016 0.31 [0.03; 3.04] 0.36[0.05; 2.35]OAK (all population), 2016, POPLAR, 201620%1,464moderatenot evaluable TRAE leading to discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsPOPLAR, 2016 0.07 [0.02; 0.29] 0.07[0.02; 0.29]POPLAR, 201610%277NAnot evaluable Alopecia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.47 [0.02; 14.16] 0.47[0.02; 14.16]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Anaemia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.39 [0.21; 0.73] 0.39[0.21; 0.73]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Arthralgia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 2.86 [0.30; 27.54] 2.86[0.30; 27.54]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Asthenia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.58 [0.24; 1.41] 0.58[0.24; 1.41]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Back pain AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 1.67 [0.49; 5.73] 1.67[0.49; 5.73]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Constipation AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 1.90 [0.17; 21.02] 1.90[0.17; 21.02]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Cough AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 1.90 [0.17; 21.02] 1.90[0.17; 21.02]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Decreased appetite AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.21 [0.04; 0.97] 0.21[0.04; 0.97]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Diarrhoea AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.34 [0.11; 1.08] 0.34[0.11; 1.08]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Dysgeusia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.95 [0.02; 47.91] 0.95[0.02; 47.91]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Dyspnoea AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 1.02 [0.49; 2.13] 1.02[0.49; 2.13]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Fatigue AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.69 [0.37; 1.31] 0.69[0.37; 1.31]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Febrile neutropenia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.01 [0.00; 0.10] 0.01[0.00; 0.10]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Myalgia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.24 [0.03; 2.12] 0.24[0.03; 2.12]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Nausea AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 1.90 [0.35; 10.44] 1.90[0.35; 10.44]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Neutropenia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.03 [0.01; 0.11] 0.03[0.01; 0.11]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Peripheral neuropathy AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.07 [0.00; 1.18] 0.07[0.00; 1.18]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Peripheral oedema AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.32 [0.03; 3.04] 0.32[0.03; 3.04]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Pyrexia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.95 [0.06; 15.21] 0.95[0.06; 15.21]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Stomatitis AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.08 [0.01; 0.66] 0.08[0.01; 0.66]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable Vomiting AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsOAK (all population), 2016 0.47 [0.09; 2.59] 0.47[0.09; 2.59]OAK (all population), 201610%1,187NAnot evaluable0.020.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-11-05 19:25 +01:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 161,226,41,225,182,198,179,200,195,254,242,243,199,190,229,266,191,196,36,228,174,171,173,307,165,163,176,308,164,166,220,197,255,37,245,204,244,241,227,217,177,279,167,1,170,261,280,168,169,335,334 - treatments: 851,361,602,1070,671,865,744,696,1083,1281,1282,1283,1082,866