• metastatic-recurrent HNSCC (mHNSCC)
• mHNSCC - (neo)adjuvant (NA)
• mHNSCC - 1st line (L1)
• mHNSCC - L1 - all population 2
• mHNSCC - L1 - PDL1 positive 4
• mHNSCC - 2nd line (L2)
• mHNSCC - L2 - all population 4
• mHNSCC - L2 - PDL1 negative 2
• mHNSCC - L2 - PDL1 positive 1
• hepatocell cancer (HCC)

 

• immune chekpoint inhibitors
• anti-PD-(L)1
• durvalumab based treatment
• durvalumab alone
• nivolumab based treatment
• nivolumab alone
• pembrolizumab based treatment
• pembrolizumab alone
• pembrolizumab plus 5FU plus platin
• Immune checkpoint association
• durvalumab plus tremelimumab

• versus all
• vs chemotherapy
• vs Standard of Care (SoC)
• vs HER inhibitor
• vs EGFR inhibitor
• vs cetuximab based chemotherapy
• vs cetuximab plus platin plus 5FU
• vs immune chekpoint inhibitors
• vs anti-CTLA-4
• vs tremelimumab
• vs anti-PD-(L)1
• vs durvalumab based treatment
• vs durvalumab alone

  All patients Age < 65y (younger) Age > 75y (older) Asian type ECOG 0 ECOG 1 Gender, female Gender, male P16 positive (HPV) PD-L1 < 1% PD-L1 < 10% PDL1 (TC0 and IC0 : <1% of TC and IC) PDL1 (TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 : ≥1% of TC or IC) PDL1 < 25% PDL1 >25% smoker (Current) smoker (Former) smoker (never)

• study list
• mapping
• overview
• meta-analysis
• forest plot
• NMA
• excluded

Top evidence (RCT only, high risk of bias excluded) Best available evidence (possibly low or very low) All RCTs All studies (RCT+OBS)   studies

metastatic-recurrent HNSCC (mHNSCC), durvalumab plus tremelimumab vs. tremelimumab, meta-analysis of study results

No data for this selection

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;