• metastatic/advanced NSCLC (mNSCLC) - 2nd line (L2) 5
• mNSCLC - L2 - adenocarcinoma cell
• mNSCLC - L2 - all population 5
• mNSCLC - L2 - EGFR high
• mNSCLC - L2 - EGFR mutant 1
• mNSCLC - L2 - EGFR wild type
• mNSCLC - L2 - KRAS mutant
• mNSCLC - L2 - KRAS wild type
• mNSCLC - L2 - PDL1 negative 1
• mNSCLC - L2 - PDL1 positive 7
• non squamous cell - mNSCLC - L2
• non squamous - mNSCLC - L2 - all population 1
• non squamous - mNSCLC - L2 - EGFR mutant
• non squamous - mNSCLC - L2 - PDL1 positive
• non squamous - mNSCLC - L2 - wild type (WT)
• squamous cell - mNSCLC - L2
• squamous - mNSCLC - L2 - all population 1
• squamous - mNSCLC - L2 - PDL1 positive

 

• gene alteration target therapy
• BRAF gene alteration targeted therapy
• BRAF inhibitor
• combined BRAF-MEK inhibitors
• trametinib plus dabrafenib
• KRAS gene alteration targeted therapy
• sotorasib
• immune chekpoint inhibitors
• anti-PD-(L)1
• atezolizumab based treatment
• atezolizumab alone
• avelumab based treatment
• avelumab alone
• durvalumab based treatment
• durvalumab alone
• durvalumab plus osimertinib
• nivolumab based treatment
• nivolumab alone
• pembrolizumab based treatment
• pembrolizumab alone
• pembrolizumab (10mg/kg)
• pembrolizumab (2mg/kg)
• Tislelizumab
• Immune checkpoint association
• durvalumab plus tremelimumab

• versus all
• vs chemotherapy
• vs non platinum-based chemotherapy
• vs taxanes
• vs docetaxel
• vs Standard of Care (SoC)
• vs gene alteration target therapy
• vs EGFR gene alteration
• vs osimertinib
• vs non active control
• vs no control (uncontrolled study)

  All patients Age < 65y (younger) Age > 65y Asian type cell type, adenocarcinoma cell EGFR mutant EGFR wild type Gender, female Gender, male RAS mutant RAS wild type smoker (current or former) smoker (never)

• study list
• mapping
• overview
• meta-analysis
• forest plot
• NMA
• excluded

Top evidence (RCT only, high risk of bias excluded) Best available evidence (possibly low or very low) All RCTs All studies (RCT+OBS)   studies

metastatic/advanced NSCLC (mNSCLC) - 2nd line (L2), ... vs. ..., meta-analysis of study results

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;