studies

metastatic/advanced NSCLC (mNSCLC) - 1st line (L1), ... vs. ..., meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsCTONG 0901, 2017 0.84 [0.63; 1.12] 0.84[0.63; 1.12]CTONG 0901, 201710%256NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsCTONG 0901, 2017 0.81 [0.62; 1.05] 0.81[0.62; 1.05]CTONG 0901, 201710%256NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsCTONG 0901, 2017 1.33 [0.81; 2.18] 1.33[0.81; 2.18]CTONG 0901, 201710%256NAnot evaluable0.52.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-01 19:36 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 196,36,228,174,171,173,307,165,163,176,308,164,166,220 - treatments: 430