studies

mNSCLC - L2 - all population, ... vs. ..., meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsWJOG 5108L, 2016 (REV) 0.96 [0.77; 1.20] 0.96[0.77; 1.20]WJOG 5108L, 2016 (REV)10%559NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsWJOG 5108L, 2016 (REV) 0.89 [0.74; 1.06] 0.89[0.74; 1.06]WJOG 5108L, 2016 (REV)10%559NAnot evaluable DCRdetailed resultsWJOG 5108L, 2016 (REV) 0.98 [0.70; 1.38] 0.98[0.70; 1.38]WJOG 5108L, 2016 (REV)10%559NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsWJOG 5108L, 2016 (REV) 0.93 [0.65; 1.33] 0.93[0.65; 1.33]WJOG 5108L, 2016 (REV)10%471NAnot evaluable0.52.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-06 06:06 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 37 - treatments: 430