studies

metastatic/advanced NSCLC (mNSCLC) - 1st line (L1), ... vs. platinum-based chemotherapy, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsIPASS (non smoker), 2012 0.97 [0.77; 1.22] 0.97[0.77; 1.22]IPASS (non smoker), 201210%1,217NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsIPASS (non smoker), 2012 0.74 [0.65; 0.85] 0.74[0.65; 0.85]IPASS (non smoker), 201210%1,217NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsIPASS (non smoker), 2012 1.59 [1.25; 2.02] 1.59[1.25; 2.02]IPASS (non smoker), 201210%1,217NAnot evaluable0.55.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-02 23:36 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 196,36,228,174,171,173,307,165,163,176,308,164,166,220 - treatments: 428