studies

lung cancer : non small cell (NSCLC), ... vs. platinum-based chemotherapy, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsENSURE, 2015 0.91 [0.62; 1.33] 0.91[0.62; 1.33]ENSURE, 201510%217NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsENSURE, 2015 0.34 [0.22; 0.52] TORCH, 2008 1.53 [1.32; 1.78] 0.73[0.17; 3.19]ENSURE, 2015, TORCH, 2008298%977moderatenot evaluable0.52.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-01 19:18 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 161,226,41,225,182,198,179,200,195,254,242,243,199,190,229,266,191,196,36,228,174,171,173,307,165,163,176,308,164,166,220,197,255,37,245,204,244,241,227,217,177,279,167,1,170,261,280,168,169,335,334 - treatments: 430