studies

mNSCLC - L2 - all population, ... vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsICOGEN, 2013 (REV) 0.98 [0.79; 1.22] ISTANA, 2010 0.87 [0.61; 1.24] WJOG 5108L, 2016 1.04 [0.83; 1.29] 0.98[0.85; 1.14]ICOGEN, 2013 (REV), ISTANA, 2010, WJOG 5108L, 201630%1,115moderatenot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsISTANA, 2010 0.73 [0.51; 1.05] WJOG 5108L, 2016 1.13 [0.94; 1.35] 0.93[0.61; 1.42]ISTANA, 2010, WJOG 5108L, 2016277%720moderatenot evaluable DCRdetailed resultsICOGEN, 2013 (REV) 0.97 [0.61; 1.53] WJOG 5108L, 2016 1.02 [0.73; 1.44] 1.00[0.76; 1.32]ICOGEN, 2013 (REV), WJOG 5108L, 201620%954moderatenot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsICOGEN, 2013 (REV) 0.98 [0.63; 1.52] WJOG 5108L, 2016 1.08 [0.75; 1.55] 1.04[0.78; 1.37]ICOGEN, 2013 (REV), WJOG 5108L, 201620%866moderatenot evaluable0.52.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-06 02:44 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 37 - treatments: 428