studies

mNSCLC - L1 - all population, ... vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsTOPICAL, 2012 0.92 [0.79; 1.08] 0.92[0.79; 1.08]TOPICAL, 201210%670NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsTOPICAL, 2012 0.80 [0.68; 0.94] 0.80[0.68; 0.94]TOPICAL, 201210%670NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsTOPICAL, 2012 2.00 [0.81; 4.98] 2.00[0.81; 4.98]TOPICAL, 201210%670NAnot evaluable0.55.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-05 03:48 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 36 - treatments: 430