studies

metastatic/advanced NSCLC (mNSCLC) - 1st line (L1), ... vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsCTONG 0901, 2017 0.84 [0.63; 1.12] ENSURE, 2015 0.91 [0.62; 1.33] TOPICAL, 2012 0.92 [0.79; 1.08] 0.90[0.79; 1.03]CTONG 0901, 2017, ENSURE, 2015, TOPICAL, 201230%1,143lownot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsCTONG 0901, 2017 0.81 [0.62; 1.05] ENSURE, 2015 0.34 [0.22; 0.52] TOPICAL, 2012 0.80 [0.68; 0.94] 0.63[0.42; 0.95]CTONG 0901, 2017, ENSURE, 2015, TOPICAL, 2012386%1,143moderatenot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsCTONG 0901, 2017 1.33 [0.81; 2.18] TOPICAL, 2012 2.00 [0.81; 4.98] 1.46[0.95; 2.26]CTONG 0901, 2017, TOPICAL, 201220%926moderatenot evaluable0.22.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-03 19:47 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 196,36,228,174,171,173,307,165,163,176,308,164,166,220 - treatments: 430