studies

endometrial cancer, avelumab based treatment vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsMITO END-3, 2023 1.13 [0.62; 2.06] 1.13[0.62; 2.06]MITO END-3, 202310%125NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsMITO END-3, 2023 0.78 [0.51; 1.19] 0.78[0.51; 1.19]MITO END-3, 202310%125NAnot evaluable AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsMITO END-3, 2023 0.61 [0.29; 1.28] 0.61[0.29; 1.28]MITO END-3, 202310%122NAnot evaluable AE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsMITO END-3, 2023 4.10 [0.18; 92.86] 4.10[0.18; 92.86]MITO END-3, 202310%122NAnot evaluable0.210.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-10-01 08:19 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 77,383 - treatments: 852,417,603,1051,876