studies

metastatic/advanced NSCLC (mNSCLC) - 1st line (L1), ... vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsRELAY, 2017 0.59 [0.46; 0.76] 0.59[0.46; 0.76]RELAY, 201710%449NAnot evaluable DCRdetailed resultsRELAY, 2017 0.90 [0.37; 2.17] 0.90[0.37; 2.17]RELAY, 201710%449NAnot evaluable DORdetailed resultsRELAY, 2017 0.45 [0.28; 0.72] 0.45[0.28; 0.72]RELAY, 201710%339NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsRELAY, 2017 1.09 [0.71; 1.68] 1.09[0.71; 1.68]RELAY, 201710%449NAnot evaluable AE (any grade)detailed resultsRELAY, 2017 0.98 [0.02; 49.72] 0.98[0.02; 49.72]RELAY, 201710%446NAnot evaluable AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsRELAY, 2017 1.97 [1.34; 2.90] 1.97[1.34; 2.90]RELAY, 201710%446NAnot evaluable AE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsRELAY, 2017 4.10 [0.18; 91.44] 4.10[0.18; 91.44]RELAY, 201710%446NAnot evaluable AE leading to treatment discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsRELAY, 2017 1.22 [0.68; 2.17] 1.22[0.68; 2.17]RELAY, 201710%446NAnot evaluable SAE (any grade)detailed resultsRELAY, 2017 1.58 [1.02; 2.43] 1.58[1.02; 2.43]RELAY, 201710%446NAnot evaluable0.210.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-04 01:53 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 196,36,228,174,171,173,307,165,163,176,308,164,166,220 - treatments: 1028