studies

mNSCLC - L1 - all population, ... vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsFLAURA, 2018 0.63 [0.45; 0.88] 0.63[0.45; 0.88]FLAURA, 201810%556NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsFLAURA, 2018 0.46 [0.37; 0.57] 0.46[0.37; 0.57]FLAURA, 201810%556NAnot evaluable DCRdetailed resultsFLAURA, 2018 2.92 [1.28; 6.68] 2.92[1.28; 6.68]FLAURA, 201810%556NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsFLAURA, 2018 1.27 [0.85; 1.90] 1.27[0.85; 1.90]FLAURA, 201810%556NAnot evaluable AE (any grade)detailed resultsFLAURA, 2018 1.01 [0.32; 3.16] 1.01[0.32; 3.16]FLAURA, 201810%556NAnot evaluable AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsFLAURA, 2018 0.67 [0.47; 0.95] 0.67[0.47; 0.95]FLAURA, 201810%556NAnot evaluable AE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsFLAURA, 2018 0.59 [0.21; 1.64] 0.59[0.21; 1.64]FLAURA, 201810%556NAnot evaluable AE leading to treatment discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsFLAURA, 2018 0.71 [0.45; 1.13] 0.71[0.45; 1.13]FLAURA, 201810%556NAnot evaluable SAE (any grade)detailed resultsFLAURA, 2018 0.81 [0.55; 1.20] 0.81[0.55; 1.20]FLAURA, 201810%556NAnot evaluable TRAE (any grade)detailed resultsFLAURA, 2018 0.42 [0.29; 0.60] 0.42[0.29; 0.60]FLAURA, 201810%556NAnot evaluable0.25.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-03 01:01 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 36 - treatments: 431