studies

lung cancer : non small cell (NSCLC), ... vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsA7471028, 2012 0.80 [0.56; 1.14] ARCHER 1009 (all population), 2014 1.08 [0.91; 1.27] ARCHER 1009 (KRAS wild type), 2014 1.10 [0.88; 1.36] ARCHER 1050, 2017 0.76 [0.58; 0.99] NCIC CTG BR.26, 2014 1.00 [0.83; 1.21] 0.97[0.85; 1.11]A7471028, 2012, ARCHER 1009 (all population), 2014, ARCHER 1009 (KRAS wild type), 2014, ARCHER 1050, 2017, NCIC CTG BR.26, 2014543%2,757lownot evaluable deaths (OS) (extension)detailed resultsARCHER 1050, 2017 0.75 [0.59; 0.95] 0.75[0.59; 0.95]ARCHER 1050, 201710%452NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsA7471028, 2012 0.66 [0.47; 0.92] ARCHER 1009 (all population), 2014 0.94 [0.80; 1.10] ARCHER 1009 (KRAS wild type), 2014 1.02 [0.83; 1.25] ARCHER 1050, 2017 0.59 [0.47; 0.74] NCIC CTG BR.26, 2014 0.66 [0.55; 0.79] 0.76[0.61; 0.95]A7471028, 2012, ARCHER 1009 (all population), 2014, ARCHER 1009 (KRAS wild type), 2014, ARCHER 1050, 2017, NCIC CTG BR.26, 2014582%2,757lownot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsA7471028, 2012 3.65 [1.28; 10.43] ARCHER 1009 (all population), 2014 1.44 [0.92; 2.26] ARCHER 1009 (KRAS wild type), 2014 1.19 [0.70; 2.03] ARCHER 1050, 2017 0.53 [0.33; 0.85] NCIC CTG BR.26, 2014 6.02 [1.83; 19.81] 1.57[0.79; 3.13]A7471028, 2012, ARCHER 1009 (all population), 2014, ARCHER 1009 (KRAS wild type), 2014, ARCHER 1050, 2017, NCIC CTG BR.26, 2014583%2,757lownot evaluable AE (any grade)detailed resultsARCHER 1050, 2017 4.11 [0.46; 37.05] 4.11[0.46; 37.05]ARCHER 1050, 201710%451NAnot evaluable AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsARCHER 1050, 2017 2.41 [1.64; 3.53] 2.41[1.64; 3.53]ARCHER 1050, 201710%451NAnot evaluable AE leading to treatment discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsARCHER 1050, 2017 1.61 [0.95; 2.72] NCIC CTG BR.26, 2014 11.74 [2.82; 48.89] 3.87[0.56; 26.81]ARCHER 1050, 2017, NCIC CTG BR.26, 2014285%1,167lownot evaluable SAE (any grade)detailed resultsNCIC CTG BR.26, 2014 1.13 [0.82; 1.56] 1.13[0.82; 1.56]NCIC CTG BR.26, 201410%716NAnot evaluable TRAE (any grade)detailed resultsARCHER 1009 (all population), 2014 1.77 [1.07; 2.93] 1.77[1.07; 2.93]ARCHER 1009 (all population), 201410%872NAnot evaluable TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsARCHER 1009 (all population), 2014 1.68 [1.23; 2.28] 1.68[1.23; 2.28]ARCHER 1009 (all population), 201410%872NAnot evaluable TRAE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsA7471028, 2012 1.01 [0.14; 7.33] ARCHER 1009 (all population), 2014 4.03 [0.45; 36.18] NCIC CTG BR.26, 2014 3.02 [0.15; 60.52] 2.06[0.55; 7.72]A7471028, 2012, ARCHER 1009 (all population), 2014, NCIC CTG BR.26, 201430%1,775lownot evaluable TRAE leading to discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsA7471028, 2012 3.74 [0.76; 18.52] ARCHER 1050, 2017 1.50 [0.75; 2.96] 1.76[0.89; 3.50]A7471028, 2012, ARCHER 1050, 201727%638lownot evaluable0.510.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-03 19:43 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 161,226,41,225,182,198,179,200,195,254,242,243,199,190,229,266,191,196,36,228,174,171,173,307,165,163,176,308,164,166,220,197,255,37,245,204,244,241,227,217,177,279,167,1,170,261,280,168,169,335,334 - treatments: 427