pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

breast cancer (BC), lapatinib based treatment versus capecitabine, meta-analysis of study results

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

deaths (OS) 0.81 [0.65, 1.00]< 10%1 study (1/-)97.2 %NAnot evaluable crucial-
objective responses (ORR) 1.70 [0.96, 3.03]> 10%1 study (1/-)96.5 %NAnot evaluable non important-

safety endpoints 00

AE leading to treatment discontinuation (any grade) 1.15 [0.59, 2.25]< 10%1 study (1/-)33.7 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.